| Back to Home |
Repeater Linking By Kevin K. Custer W3KKC With a few comments from Mike Morris WA6ILQ |
|
The 'best way' to link repeater sites is really dependent on the situation and personal preference, so instead of giving you one "best" way, I'll give you a few examples of how it can be done and you can decide what it the best for your situation. This article is oriented towards linking repeaters in the amateur service, but the procedures could be followed to link commercial sites as well; assuming you are within the rules of the particular commercial service.
The "Remote Base" type link system is the most common because of its simplicity and low cost. Basically a second radio (even a old hand held or mobile rig) is connected to a repeater that you want linked to another and uses that new radio just as if it was a regular "user radio" on the other system. This "link" radio need not be duplex because of the way the link and repeaters are configured. Naturally the remote base radio will need to be on the same band, frequency, split, and PL as the repeater you are linking to. Remote Base operations in the amateur radio service can be carried out on any amateur voice band, even HF! Links below 220 MHz should be used on a part time basis because the FCC says that 'linking' must be done above 222.15 MHz, however Remote Base operation is left to individual and local interpretation.
Commonly, when deploying a link SYSTEM that will be * ON * full time - a repeater on 222.15 MHz. or above in the center of the desired coverage area is designated to be the system "HUB". Sometimes a new repeater is installed just to be the hub system. You can remote base, or "link", as many "outboard" repeaters into the hub as you wish, providing each of the outlying repeater site(s) has a good RF path to the hub. Unless you use an audio notch filter the MCW ID from the hub system will be heard through the entire system. If you like voice ID's, they need only exist on the hub. Since you can disconnect or "un-link" any repeater from the system, all outboard repeaters should have their own controller with it's own ID. The controller at the outlying sites needs to have 2 ports, one for the repeater and one for the remote base radio.
Several controller companies make controllers that have remote base link capability as part of their feature set. The sequence listed below is NOT an indication of preference. All have web pages at this repeater site.
How a Remote Base works.....
Basically, a Remote Base link is an addition to a normal repeater,
which works like this: the user transmits on the input frequency,
the controller recognizes the user and keys the repeater transmitter.
Audio from the repeater receiver is transferred into the repeater transmitter,
and the user is heard on the repeaters output frequency. When the
user unkeys, the controller adds some 'hang time' (also called "carrier
delay") on the repeater transmitter; during this time is when the courtesy
tone, if any, is heard and the repeater transmitter drops after this time
(usually 1 to 5 seconds) has expired. A repeater with a remote base
operates the same as any other repeater, except that it has three
modes: "remote base off" (i.e. repeater is normal), "remote base receive"
(or monitor), and "remote base transmit" (or transcieve). In the
receive or monitor mode the repater listens to two frequencies, the
normal input and also whatever frequency the remote base radio is listening
to. In most cases the courtesy beep is changed so that the listening
user can tell that the system is in monitor mode, and which receiver the
signal is coming in on (i.e. maybe "beep" for the main channel, and "boop"
for the remote base channel). When the remote base is in transmit
mode the user keys into the repeater on the input frequency, the controller
recognizes the user and keys the repeater transmitter and the remote
base radios transmitter, the user speaks and their voice gowes out not only
on the repeater, but also on the remote base transmitter. Naturally,
if the remote base is dialed on a repeater frequency, the users voice is
heard on the linked repeater also. When the user unkeys, the remote
base transmitter drops immediately while the repeater transmitter continues
to transmit during the carrier delay ('hang time') as usual. The instant
the remote base radio unkeys it reverts to receive mode and the remote base
user will hear the far end repeater's courtesy beep (if any). The remote
base could just as well be on a simplex frequency, or even an HF frequency (yes,
you can run a 20 meter SSB killowatt using your 440mhz handheld). It is
good practice to have the courtesy beep on the repeater side of the remote
base to have an indication that the remote is in transmit mode - maybe a
"beep" for the main channel receive, "boop" for the remote base channel
receive, and "bee-boop" for remote base transmit enabled.
With this type of link, the remote base transmitter is only 'on the air' when the user is transmitting; thus the link transmitter follows the activity of the local user, (I.E. link PTT only during COS/PL). Activity heard on the remote base receiver makes the controller key the repeater transmitter and this audio is heard over the local repeater transmitter. So, immediately after the user unkeys the audio from the linked repeater is transmitted over the local repeater and you hear its courtesy tone and hang time. Since the remote base transmitter is keyed off and on, its duty cycle is really no more than the user so you don't have to be overly concerned about it burning up because of not being rated for continuous duty (unless someone on the repeater side sits on their microphone...).
Many times a handheld radio (like an Icom IC-2AT or IC-3AT) on low power is plenty good enough to link to another repeater. Remember you are linking one repeater site to another and many times this path is "line of sight". Remote base antennas can range from a simple rubber duck when linking to another local repeater to a tower mounted beam or corner reflector for more distant sites. Remember the FCC says linking antennas need to be directional. Some link systems are frequency and band agile, meaning you can select a particular band, frequency, split, PL frequency and even power remotely. The ACC controller company made this type of linking popular with the FC-1 and FC-900 link interfaces. A more modern combination is a NHRC-10 and an Icom 706 which covers 160m through 6m (complete with an autopatch), later models added 2m and 450mhz. Back in the 1970s the Arizona division of the Cactus radio group had a 12 channel 250 watt 2m remote base connected to one of the UHF system sites, complete with a remotely controllable antenna rotator - the Cactus Remote Antenna Pointing system. All TTL logic, no microprocessors, all crystal controlled.
Hopefully by now you see that this type of link system is just like operating a handheld or mobile rig that talks to another repeater while you sitting at your own repeater site. The only difference is you have the ability to do it while away from the site; in fact anywhere the repeater side of your remote base has coverage... From your office, home, the restaurant, anywhere.
Another trick: you can have a repeater at a hilltop site, with a 420mhz link back to your house, and operate your HF station at your house as a remote base. It would take a two-port controller at the repeater site feeding the link radio, and a controller capable of operating the HF radio at you house controlled by the link radio. WA6ILQ once watched a gentleman work Pitcarin Island on 20 meters using his 2m handheld while sitting in a booth at a Dennys Restaurant.
Here are url's to 3 systems, local to me, using this type of linking
system:
http://www.kuggie.com/target
http://www.n8yib.com
http://www.shol.com/kuggie/ahra/hmft.html
Full Duplex?
A different method of linking sites, commonly used in larger link systems,
like those of the Cactus Intertie (originally based in California but now
in many states - see the map
and realize that every dot is a fully functioning UHF repeater, and every
line is a point-to-point full duplex link), NERA, and other larger systems
use full duplex radio systems to accomplish their links. This type
of system is likely better for full time systems if you can afford it. It's
expensive because every link is just like running another complete repeater
(remember it's duplex), so duplexers are often required along with modified
radios that will operate full duplex for extended duty cycles. The
controllers needed for this type of system need a duplex audio buss inside
them and hence are complex and expensive (and in many cases are designed
and built by the group themselves). Implementing this type of system
(correctly) is not an easy task. This type of system *could* have
the links transmitting all the time, but usually doesn't. This eliminates
any 'lag' time for the system to become active, and usually sounds
much better due to running "flat audio" throughout the system. There
are articles on flat audio at this web site.
Here are url's to their systems so I'll not go into trying to explain
them here - again:
http://www.cactus-intertie.org/ (see
the map mentioned above)
http://www.qsl.net/nera/
Internet Linking:
The latest type of linking to hit the amateur scene is via the internet. IRLP,
I-Link, EchoLink, app_rpt - Asterisk, TLB, and others have shown that
the internet is a great way to connect repeaters together that have quite
a distance between them (or poor radio path). All you need is to
have access to a good internet connection at the repeater site, or a
point-to-point link to a location that has it. Just realize that any natural
disaster that affects the internet connection (i.e. the DSL goes down) will
take out your link.
Here is information on those systems:
Linked repeater systems
Page created March 24 2003 by W3KKC
This web page, this web site, the information presented in and on its pages and in these modifications and conversions is © Copyrighted 1995 and (date of last update) by Kevin Custer W3KKC and multiple originating authors. All Rights Reserved, including that of paper and web publication elsewhere.