Back to Home   Antenna Systems Information
(antennas, feedlines, duplexers, circulators, isolators, calculators, etc.)
Compiled from a multitude of sources and donations by
Mike Morris WA6ILQ
(callsign) at repeater-builder dot com
   


Note that the contents of this page, like most here at www.repeater-
builder.com, are totally dependent on donations of information.

If you have something to share please consider writing it up and sending it in.

If you have relevant data sheets, class handouts or any other information that we do not have here, please consider scanning them and emailing us the scans.

If you don't have access to a scanner we can arrange to get documents scanned and made into a PDF for download.
Please email Mike WA6ILQ at (callsign) //at// repeater-builder //dot// com for details.


Jump to:         System Engineering       Antennas       Towers       Connectors, Coax and Shielding
  Cavities and Duplexers       Combiners       Isolators and Circulators      Calculators      Mobile Antennas     


Just in case you are trying to locate some documentation...

Phelps-Dodge (also known as PD) was bought by Celwave (year?), which was bought by Radio Frequency Systems (aka RFS) (year?) whose web site is at http://www.rfsworld.com/RFSGlobal.   If you are looking for other web pages containing information on a specific antenna - for example some repeater group whose web page mentions a Phelps-Dodge PD-458 in passing - you may have to check under all three company names.   For example, under Google, you would type (less the square brackets): [ "Phelps Dodge" OR Celwave OR "Radio Frequency Systems" OR "RFS" 458 ].   Note that the OR parameter in a Google search must be in ALL CAPS.


Antenna Specialists was sold to PCTel (year?) - and their corporate web site is at http://www.antenna.com, and the product web site is at http://www.antenna.com/products.html.   The 2-way mobile product model number lookup page is at http://www.antenna.com/lm_cat/index.html.


I was told recently that PCTel bought both Maxrad and Antennex (but I don't know the dates)


DB Products was bought by Andrew, but they didn't want everything. The leftovers (including duplexers) are now sold by a company called dbSpectra, located in Lewisville, Texas (the web site is at http://www.dbspectra.com). From their web site: "...in December of 2004, dbSpectra signed a licensing agreement with Andrew Corporation to manufacture and sell the Legacy Decibel Products site management equipment such as filters, duplexers, combiners, tower top amplifiers and more. These products had been outsourced and dbSpectra successfully brought them back and have since hired many of the personnel involved in the design and manufacture of these excellent products."

In March of 2006 the Laird Group of England (AKA LairdTech) purchased Antenex for about $20.5 million, and then in Febuary of 2007 bought Cushcraft for about $90 million.

And about month later Andrew purchased the English manufacturer Precision Antennas for about $36 million.

In December of 2007 Andrew was bought by CommScope for US$2.6 Billion.
Here's the current Andrew/Commscope catalog.


In many cases you will find that manufacturers web sites have theoretical information that is applicable to all... i.e. the theory articles on Manufacturer "X" products applies to Manufacturer "Y" and to "Z". Sometimes researching other manufacturers web sites can save you a lot of money... for example, if Manufacturer "X" claims that a crystal filter will solve your desense problem. Then you go to "Y"s web site and there you discover that, yes, a crystal filter can be used in the receiver feedline to notch out a local signal, or to pass your signal. What the Manufacturer "X" web site didn't tell you, and the Manufacturer "Y " or "Z" web site did, is that in your specific case it may not work. Unless you were familiar with crystal filters you would not know that the insertion loss can be as high as 12db, which in many cases makes a crystal filter on a repeater receiver unusable.... the signal level budget just isn't there (i.e. while adding the crystal filter would kill the interfering signal, it also reduced your receiving range to 1/2 of what it was, or maybe even less). So do your homework and learn all you can about the theory behind the hardware before you hand over your money.


System Engineering, and a few commments...
A system's coverage area is primarily determined by how well it receives stations in the field, not by how much transmitter power it has. Both the receiver and the transmitter depend on antennas - and both it and the feedline are usually the most critical components in any amateur radio station, be it a home station, a mobile, a repeater, a remote base or a point-to-point link. Perversely they are usually are the most difficult to install, maintain, or troubleshoot - and usually during extreme climate conditions like in freezing temperatures and / or high winds. If you are installing a repeater that will be primary in any type of emergency services situations it does not make any sense to go "cheap" on the antenna system. Creative (legal) aquisition of good quality equipment, yes. Low or poor quality equipment, no... that decision will always come back and haunt you. Simply put, a good antenna will hear and talk better than a poor antenna and for a lot longer time. If you go with quality hardware and proper installation the first time you won't have to do it over and over (like my dad used to say about both hand and power tools: "buying quality only hurts once").   A good Phelps-Dodge, DB Products or Sinclair antenna connected to 7/8 inch Heliax feedline (you can use 1/2 inch on 6m or 10m) will last over 20 years of seriously hostile winters. How many Comets, Diamonds, Hustlers or replacement lengths of RG-series feedline will you buy and install in the same 20 years ?

A preamp can help some systems, but realize that preamps are all about the internal noise figure (NF) of the preamp and the amount of gain it provides. The lower the NF, the weaker the signal that will be heard. Regarding gain, most modern preamps have gain on the order of 14-18dB in a single stage. That's enough to take a signal that's barely above the noise floor and make it very usable on a decent receiver. But don't attempt to use a preamp to make up for a long, lossy feedline - once you've lost the signal all the preamp does is amplify what's left (the noisy signal). Likewise don't attempt to use a preamp to make up for a poor receiver - fix or replace the receiver. There are ways to put a preamp up at the antenna (but only if it is a receive-only antenna). Many sites use shared "community receive" antennas that feed a preamp/multicoupler panel - at one site I visit semi-regularly there is a single UHF (406-512 MHz) Sinclair antenna that feeds all of the UHF system receivers (over 35 of them).

On the transmit side, never forget that SWR is not the only measure of antenna performance. A low SWR only means that the transmitter is "seeing" a reasonably non-reactive load. That is, it is neither capacitive or inductive, it looks like a 50 ohm resistor (a dummy load). The SWR tells you nothing about what is really important, the antenna efficiency, the antenna noise level, its pattern (gain) and decoupling of the RF from the feedline. And don't forget that the feedline loss runs both directions and can dramatically affect the SWR reading !! Your transmitter sends power up the feedline (let's say it's 100 watts), and some gets lost going up (let's say that it's 20% and 80w gets there). The lightning-damaged antenna reflects some power back down (let's say it's 10%, or 8 watts). The 8 watts comes back down, and 20% gets lost, and you see 6.4 watts on the Bird wattmeter. So you see 100 going up and 6.4 coming back, and you think the SWR is a lot better than it really is at the antenna. Look at this web page on the topic: Power Antenna Manufacturing Inc. SWR Calculator (an off-site link). It removes the "masking effect" of the feedline loss.

Speaking of "gain", there are a lot of people that don't understand it. Some people actually think that by picking a higher gain antenna they can "regain the loss caused by the coax". Well, that's a total joke. Go read the Antenna Gain writeup by Marc Dekenah ZS6MGD at http://www.marcspages.co.uk/tech/antgain.htm.

Before you sign a site agreement, pay your money, and go to the trouble of installing a complete system you will want to measure the noise floor on your frequency at the site. Just borrow an appropriate already-installed antenna for fifteen minutes (with permission) and make the measurement (i.e. if you are installing a VHF system use a VHF antenna). If site A has a 0.8uv noise floor (due to the broadcast and paging systems there) and site B has a 0.1uv noise floor take a guess as to which site will hear better (and I have seen sites that have noise floors that are above 2.0 uv on the frequency of interest). Fifteen minutes may not be enough - you want to get all the offenders, and that may take an hour or two. There are spectrum analyzers with digital memory and some can do additive recordings - they can assemble the worst-case scenario, but there are workarounds: I once saw a video camera (with a 6-hour tape in it) focused on a spectrum analyzer at a site... the person said he was going to do frame grabs with his computer and superimpose them.
Once you have an interference profile mapped, you may chose to install a UHF system at a particular site if the noise floor on VHF is intolerable (or vice versa). And with repeaters it all depends on how well you hear (see the article on measuring effective sensitivity below). Given the limits of antenna power rating, feedline and local geography, increasing the talk range is easy - how much amplifier, duplexer and antenna can you afford?

In most repeaters the duplexer provides a certain amount of isolation between the receiver and the transmitter (some systems, like those that use two antennas, or even two sites, don't use duplexers). If the amount of isolation, however it is acquired, is greater than what is required (the excess is sometimes referred to as "headroom"), then the system design is adequate for the job (see the article Some thoughts on Repeater Receiver-to-Transmitter Isolation below). That situation is fine until they decide to add a preamp to help out the handheld users. Then they discover that the amount of isolation isn't enough. They forgot that you need (at least) the same amount of extra isolation ("headroom") as the amount of gain the preamp provides, since it raises the apparent noise floor as well as the signal of interest. In most cases you will have to fight with desense when you add a preamp (a top-quality preamp like an AngleLinear will help). Always have enough extra headroom in your receiver, transmitter and duplexer to handle any of a couple of situations: First, the site owner adds additional repeaters to the site, or second, that you want to add a preamp later on. If the duplexer is your primary provider of receiver-to-transmitter isolation do not scrimp on the duplexer. Next to a good antenna and feedline the duplexer is the most critical part of a good repeater system. Long ago I gave up on four-cavity duplexers (two cavities on each side) on VHF/2m, 222 MHz and UHF, I use the six cavity pass/reject type exclusively. Duplexer tuning is very, very critical. A return loss bridge is preferred, a spectrum analyzer with a tracking generator is the second choice. And don't tune the duplexer on the ground, then transport it to the site over a bumpy four-wheel-drive road, and expect it to be as precisely tuned when you get there. Always have the test gear with you at the site to verify final tuning after mounting it in the system rack.
Getting the most from your repeater system   By Kevin Custer W3KKC
RF Communications - A Non Technical Approach   By Decibel Products Corp.
Many years ago Decibel Products (a major RF hardware manufacturer) published a series of informative pamphlets on systems engineering topics.   The earliest seems to be 1964.   The topics included Base Station Antennas, Combiners, Selective Cavities, Duplexers, RF Transmission Lines and Lightning.   All five pamphlets were recently combined into a single PDF document titled "RF Communications - A Non-Technical Approach".   DB made it available on their web site at http://www.decibelproducts.com/collateral/aboutrfcommunications.pdf.   This document should be required reading for anyone wanting to learn about antenna systems.   (thanks to Duane Hall KA8GVH for the pointer)
TX-RX Tech Aid #77001   Some very useful charts and procedures. Worth printing and adding to your tech notebook.   By TX-RX Corp.
Help!! My repeater seems deaf   By Kevin K. Custer W3KKC
Receiver desense testing   By Karl Shoemaker AK2O of the Spokane Repeater Group   (offsite link)
Is a 3 DB change in power really worth it?   The answer is "It Depends"   By Neil Johnson WBØEMU     If you are in charge of maintaining a repeater system, or building a new one, then this is worth reading.
Some thoughts on Repeater Receiver-to-Transmitter Isolation   By Mike Morris WA6ILQ
Guidelines for mounting antennas on towers   A scan of a guidelines page covering tower-to-antenna distances - donated by Skipp
ANTPLOT - A Side-Tower Mounted Antenna Pattern Prediction Program   This is a Zip file of both version 5.3 and of version 5.4 of the DOS program originally provided by Antenna Specialists. It's noted as being "Program No. 3 of the Antenna Specialists RF TOOLS Series". Also called "tplot" for some reason. Donated by A. Nony Mous
Does anyone have Program #1, #2 and any others?
Recommended Coax and Connectors for the iDEN Enhanced Base Transceiver System   Motorola Engineering wrote this three page discussion of cable and connector types with regard to combining, intermodulation, and other RF performace factors. They concluded that LMR-nnn and LMR-nnnn series cable is specifically NOT recommended in any radio site RF environments, especially duplex environments. While iDEN is a 900 MHz system the physics are the same at 28 MHz through 1296 MHz. Well worth reading.
HELIAX Coaxial Cable for Low Intermodulation Generation   Andrew Engineering wrote this one page writeup on why foil-braid cable causes intermod. Despite the fact that you'd expect that conclusion from the makers of Heliax there's a lot less sales pitch and a lot more engineering presented than you'd think. Worth reading.
Where exactly is your repeater?   And are you really sure? Read this before you file any paperwork and help out your local coordination folks, and prevent an FCC or FAA citation.   Donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
MIL-STD-188-124B "Grounding, Bonding, and Shielding for Common Long Haul/Tactical Communication Systems including Ground Based Communications-Electronics Facilities and Equipments"   3.8mb PDF file dated 01-Feb-92
This is the newer military handbook on grounding, and is a quicker read at about 40 pages, however it says on the second page of the forward that "This Standard is further implemented by MIL-HDBK-419", listed below. This handbook is approved for public release and distribution is unlimited.
MIL-HDBK-419A "Grounding, Bonding, and Shielding for Electronic Equipments and Facilities"   9.6mb PDF file dated 29-DEC-1987
This is the big military handbook on grounding. It is large, in two volumes totaling about 812 pages. Volume one is 396 pages of theory, volume two is 394 pages of practice. This download is the complete 2 volume set in one PDF file, and volume 2 starts on page 419 of the file. This book covers grounding for safety, lightning, nuclear blast and most everything else. A very good read and a real eye opener. This handbook is approved for public release and distribution is unlimited.
At one point (Feb 1999), the hardcopy (including postage) was FREE if you ordered it from:
Commanding Officer
Naval Publication and Forms Center
5801 Taylor Avenue
Philladelphia PA 19120
MIL-STD-464 "Department of Defense Interface Standard Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Requirements for Systems"   1.17mb PDF file dated 18-Mar-97
"This standard establishes electromagnetic environmental effects (E3) requirements and verification criteria for airborne, sea, space, and ground systems, including associated ordnance." This handbook is approved for public release and distribution is unlimited.
Why, you might ask, is this one on a web page that covers antenna systems? Well, "electromagnetic environmental effects" includes lightning. And lightning can have seriously negative effects on antenna systems (and the radios they are connected to).
High power amplifiers and duplex radio   Tubes vs. Transistors,   By Kevin Custer W3KKC   Short version: at high power levels tubes win.
Is this connector any good?   An article on the perils of cheap connectors by Jeff DePolo WN3A
EMR Corp. Technical Papers Index   An index of downloadable PDF papers on Isolators, Duplexer retuning, Ferrite and Hybrid Combiners, Multicouplers, Preselectors, Bandpass and Pass-Notch Cavity Resonators.
Using Preamps with repeaters... and why sometimes you wouldn't want to...   by Mark Malm NØFAZ and Kevin K. Custer W3KKC
The Effects of Trees on Slant Propagation Paths   By Vogel & Hagn   This is an academic paper that will be of special interest to UHF, 900 & 1200 MHz system owners.
Best Practices Guide     By Motorola Inc.   This is a write up on solving interference problems at 800 MHz and oriented towards Public Safety communications, but it's worth reading by any repeater owner or builder.
Interference Technical Appendix   By Motorola Inc.   This is intended to be an add-on to the "Best Practices Guide" above.   Also very worth reading.
Calculating Your Radio Horizon   By A. Nony Mous
Radio Mobile   Coverage prediction software by Roger Coudé VE2DBE   A bit of a learning curve, but darn good stuff   (offsite link)
    A Yahoo group supporting it is at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Radio_Mobile_Deluxe
    If anybody wants to put together a "Getting Started" article, we'll make room for it here.
The calcualtors, especially Dale Bickels HAAT, Coordinate and Distance calculators are useful. Scroll down to the Calculators section for them.


Combiners
A Combiner is a system of cavities and optionally isolators (or cavities and optionally circulators paired with external loads) that allows multiple transmitters to share one transmitting antenna, but at a cost. Some combiner systems can cost you from 50% to 75% of your transmit power... i.e. that 100 watt repeater transmitter that gave you N miles radius coverage on a stand-alone antenna may only have the performace of a 50 watt or 25 watt system once the combiner is in line. Also don't forget that the antenna the combiner is feeding has a finite power limit. Some are rated at 200 watts, and by the time you combine 5 transmitters, each with 100 watts out, through a 3db loss combiner, that's still 250 watts that's going up the hose to the antenna, and (poof) goes the antenna (and the combiner needs dummy loads that can handle 250w continuous duty, and appropriate ventilation to get rid of the heat). Note that systems that use combiners usually have a separate receiving antenna that is multicoupled to each receiver.

Additional detail for this introductary paragraph, and additional articles / publications on this topic are welcome.   Anybody want to write an article on how to pick the frequencies that can be combined onto a single antenna?

About Combiners   By DB Products, copyrighted 1975.
From the preface: "This booklet has been written for the many people engaged in two-way radio communications who are NOT radio engineers. A non-technical presentation of a rather complex subject has been attempted in an effort to bring about a better understanding of combiners used in two-way radio systems."
Tuning Instructions for the DB4350 and DB4360 Low Loss Combiners   8kb   A one-page PDF file.
Tuning Procedure for Two-Transmitter Combiners DB4351, DB4381, DB4352, DB4382, DB4384
Two page 64kb PDF describing the tuneup of a unit that is essentially two isolators, two low pass filters, a hybrid coupler and a dummy load.
Product Description & Installation and Tuning Instructions for the ACT27nnJ2 and DBNXTL27nn Transmitter Combiner   85 KB   A two-page PDF file.
5-Channel Models: ACT2705J2, DBNXTL2705
10-Channel Models: ACT2710J2, DBNXTL2710
15-Channel Model: ACT2715J2
20-Channel Model: ACT2720J2
Tuning Instructions for the DB4379 Low Loss Combiner   9kb   A one-page PDF file describing a unit for up to 8 transmitters.


Isolators and Circulators
Comments below are compiled and summarized from several postings on the repeater-builder yahoogroup.
A ferrite circulator is a magnetic three-port device that acts like a one-way-valve for RF energy, and the third port usually has a dummy load attached.   An isolator is just a circulator with a built-in or bolted-on load (usually fairly low in power handling capability), and so as long as you stay within the power handling limits of the load all comments below on isolators also apply to circulators and vice versa.   Ferrite isolators and circulators are physically fragile devices - and for this reason you NEVER want to pay full price for any isolator or circulator that has a dent (or other damage) in the housing that could have been created by dropping it.   If you plan on using your own dummy load on a new circulator, you should send that dummy load with the circulator to the vendor so that the circulator can be properly tuned.   Due to the variation in impedance and return loss between individual dummy loads (even if outwardly identical), it is never a good idea to change the load(s) after an isolator is properly tuned. &nsbp; Hint: put a stripe of nail polish across the connectors of the isolator and the load, and use an obnoxious color (like fluorescent pink, bright orange or purple). If anybody swaps the loads (or even borrows it and replaces it) then it will be obvious.

If you see a "4-port circulator" advertised it's probably a dual stage circulator with two devices in one box with the output of the first fed into the input of the second, and two dummy load ports. Triple circulators also exist, and in fact were a factory option on the Motorola MSF5000 stations.

One characteristic of ferrite isolators and circulators is that they generate harmonics.   This property is inherent to the device and cannot be "tuned out".   For this reason, an isolator is always followed by a bandpass or low pass filter in any application where good engineering practice is followed.   This same situation is why folks say that isolators cause intermod.   They do, but when installed properly, the pass cavity kills off any harmonics (which precludes the intermod from ever being created).   NEVER, EVER have an isolator or circulator looking directly into an antenna !

Example: Years ago I heard about a 52.525 MHz remote base (on a UHF repeater) that had a circulator and no pass cavity on the 6m transmitter.   At the same site was a 420.200 MHz RX that was one end of a point-to-point link.   So? You ask...   Well, the 8th harmonic of 52.525 MHz is dead on 420.200 MHz.   Whenever the remote base transmitted it trashed 105.05 MHz (actually the station on 105.1) in the FM band, 157.575 MHz, and since 5 KHz deviation at 52 MHz is 40 KHz at 420 MHz it trashed 420.175 MHz, 420.200 MHz and 420.025 MHz... Ooops.

When you rent space at a 2-way site and are handed the contract terms do not be surprised to see the requirement of an "intermod panel" on each transmitter.   This "panel" consists of either (a) an isolator followed by a pass cavity, or (b) a circulator, an external dummy load, and a pass cavity. Many radio communications equipment manufacturers make isolators and circulators: Andrew, Connecticut Microwave, EMR, Celwave, Decibel Products, MECA, REC-USA, Raditek, Telewave, TX-RX, and many more.   Contact suppliers such as TESSCO or Talley for prices and availability (and make sure you are sitting down when you ask the price).   Contact information is on the suppliers index page at this web site, or you can use Google.

IMPORTANT: The frequency "range" shown on the spec sheet for a ferrite isolator or circulator is not the field tuning range of the device, it is in reality an indicator of the manufacturer's capability to build a device to any one particular frequency.   For example, once an isolator / circulator is made for a particular high band frequency, it can only be tuned about two to three percent either side of that frequency and retain optimum performance.   Once outside of that "window" (which is 4 to 6 MHz wide at 2M / high band), it will cost between $200 and $300 (about 1/3 of the new price) to have an isolator / circulator remanufactured from (for example) a 165 MHz frequency to your specific 146 MHz frequency (or from a commercial UHF frequency to your 440 MHz frequency) because it involves a considerable amount of precision bench work using RF test equipment, special mechanical tools and professional skills that very few shops or people have: copper or bronze vises (nonmagnetic) to position and clamp the isolator "just right" and nonmagnetic tools to do the actual assembly or repair, plus a network analyzer to get the RF performance "just right".   Besides, having your unit rebuilt by a person who does it 8 hours a day, and every day guarantees that it is done right the first time, it comes with a factory guarantee and lands in your hand already precision tuned on your frequency with a warranty and some nice proof-of-performance plots.   And it is much cheaper than buying a new device !   Be forewarned: Once you open an isolator or circulator housing the manufacturer may refuse to perform the rework - it's way too easy to crack a magnet or something and then all you have is an expensive precision doorstop or paperweight... (and I've seen a damaged low band isolator being used as a doorstop).

Remember that a ferrite isolator / circulator is a MAGNETIC device, and don't mount it on a steel rack panel... you WILL detune it... use aluminum panels only, using brass screws and aluminum standoffs if you need standoffs (or use a block of wood).   I'm only mentioning it because I forgot when I was cleaning up a cabinet - the UHF circulator was floating in the breeze, supported by the 7/8 inch heliax jumpers, so I rearranged things and mounted it to the same panel as the UHF pass cavity... then the system transmitter performance dropped like a rock.   A group member that lived in the fringe area of the system (he had a 6-element beam on his tower fixed pointed at the repeater) reported that the system went from its normal 90% quieting at his site to 1/3 quieting.   It was only after I measured the SWR between the isolator and the transmitter did I realize that the isolator was detuned... I switched the mounting back to "in the breeze" and the system performance went back to normal...   The temporary mounting the following day was a piece of 1x6 inch pine shelving mounted to the rack rails with drywall screws through the holes in the rail into the wood.   The permanent fix a couple of weeks later was relocating the pass cavity and the isolator to an aluminum panel and using brass screws to mount the isolator to the panel.   The pass cavity didn't care, I used regular screws for that.

If you are going to make any adjustments to an isolator / circulator do it with low power - 2 to 5 watts, maybe 10 watts max, and EACH port must be terminated with a 50 ohm load.   You don't want any off-resonance circulating currents or voltages during tuneup... at high levels they could demagnetize (or change the permanent fields of) the internal magnets and damage the isolator.   Also when tuning, in an ideal environment you would have available another (already tuned) isolator to put between the transmitter and the isolator being tuned to make sure the unit under adjustment sees a consistent 50 ohm source... in other words, the first one isolates the transmitter from the one being adjusted...

If circulators and isolators are a new topic to you, I suggest that you read the first four articles below, especially the one by William F. Lieske.   Yes, there is some repeated material between the articles, but if you're new to the topic, it won't hurt.   When you have multiple people writing on the same topic some repetition is inevitable.

What's a circulator? a.k.a. Properties of a Ferromagnetic Circulator   By Kevin Custer W3KKC
The Care and Feeding of the R.F. Isolator   a 14kb PDF by William F. Lieske, Sr. Founder, EMR Corporation
An Elementary Introduction to Ferrite Isolators, Circulators and RF Loads   a 1mb PDF file   A TX-RX Corp. "Seminar Series" writeup - 14 pages.
Circulators and Ring Hybrids   a 363 KB PDF by Wolfgang Borschel DK2DO
Field Tuning Instructions for Dual Junction Tunable Isolators   a one-page 21kb PDF file by Decibel Products
Generic single-section isolator tuning instructions from EMR   a 26kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
Generic dual-section isolator tuning instructions from EMR   a 55kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
Sinclair's instructions on tuning isolators   Donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
Microwave Associates 7R011 Isolator Tuning Instructions   Donated by Micheal Salem N5MS
Good for 125 watts, with 0.9 db insertion loss typical with 1.3 db max. The isolation can be as high as 60 db with 50 db typical.
Data sheet on the DB 4318H-2C High Band Single Channel filter and isolator
A two-page PDF file describing a Decibel Products 164 - 168.5 MHz dual isolator but the directions apply to similar units. The drawing is in error, it does not show the termaline on the output port.

Cavities, Duplexers, Theory, and More
The purpose of a duplexer is to allow the simultaneous operation of a receiver and a transmitter on the same antenna... but saying "duplexer" is like saying "car".   They come in various types, makes, models, and performance levels.   Some are notch-only, others are notch-pass.   There are 3-cavity, 4-cavity, 5-cavity, and there are 6-cavity models (more cavities give a higher level of receiver-to-transmitter isolation, but at a cost of insertion loss) and I have seen a 7-cavity.   In general, the higher the RF level at a site (i.e. how many other systems there are, and the power levels involved), the more cavities you need.   I've also seen a 4-port duplexer (it was a custom order) that allowed a 144.39 APRS gateway radio to share one antenna with a 146 MHz range 2m repeater.   And you may not need a duplexer at all if you run a split site system at a low RF level site.   And depending on circumstances even a single site system can be built with no duplexer at all.

Duplexers expect to work into a 50 ohm load, and many transmitters are not.   A duplexer is 50 ohms only at resonance, anywhere else it is reactive.   The attached feedline is 50 ohms, and the receiver or transmitter is SUPPOSED to be 50 ohms.   If it is not, the most common way to "fix" the problem is to use a "magic" length cable - but the right way is to fix the radio so it is 50 ohms.

A posting on repeater-builder a while back made the comment that the GE MASTR II UHF transmitter output impedance was mostly 50 ohms resistive, but with a capacitive or inductive component depending on what company made the output transistors.   In the early days of the Mastr II large fleet operators we having an unusually high number of PA failures.   One user that had eight repeaters was losing roughly one PA per month, and after investigation GE came up with a two-pronged fix.   Solid state power amplifiers do not like reactive loads, and the best solution is a pi-network output matching stage followed by a circulator to protect the output device(s) from an unmatched load.   GE had Decibel Products develop a "Z" Matcher device which functioned as the output tank circuit that the designer had left out.   The second prong of the field fix was that GE ended up buying a circulator for each transmitter and this solved the rest of the problem (this situation is why the Motorola Micor line has a factory-installed circulator in every PA deck).   As mentioned above, the circulator must be followed by a pass cavity, which itself might be part of a pass-notch duplexer.

Unmatched loads did not start with solid state PA decks. Feedlines over the years have been 35 ohms, 50 ohms, 72 ohms, 300 ohms, and 450 ohms. As mentioned, one way to transform impedances is to use a "magic" length of the right impedance of coax as a matching transformer.   The cable length between the end cavity and the transmitter is NOT supposed to be critical, and if it is then you have an impedance problem.   While the most common situation is between the transmitter power amplifier and the duplexer, the same situation can happen on the receiver, it is just much less visible.   Matching the transmitter to the suplexer is covered in this article Cabling lengths between he Duplexer and Radio Set.   Despite the article title, there is a lot of Z-matcher info there.

Tony King W4ZT has some information on the Z-Matcher that GE built into the Mastr II stations at the W4ZT Z-Matcher page. The closeup photos show how GE simply replaced the antenna relay (normally replaced with a jumper in repeater service) with the Z-matcher daughter board.
The schematic to the GE Z-Matcher is here.
It's part of LBI-30201G.
The tuneup info for the DB Products Z-matchers is here.

A duplexer is made up of a number of cavities and a similar number of critical length cables, each of which adds to the total transmit-to-recieve isolation provided by the assembly.   If you're just starting out, I suggest that you read the first eight articles below, expecially those by Jacques Audet VE2AZX, John Portune W6NBC and by William F. Lieske.   Yes, there is some repeated material between the articles, but if you're new to duplexers, it won't hurt.   When you have multiple people writing on the same topic some repetition is inevitable.   The 8 articles collectively will give you a basic education on duplexers.

The proper way to tune a cavity or a duplexer is to use 6db or 10db 50 ohm pads between the test equipment and the cavity or endmost duplexer can, as that ensures that pad "masks" any non-50-ohm-impedance in your test equipment and ensures that the duplexer is really tuned to precisely 50 ohms.

Note that duplexers are initially tuned and the ports labeled at the factory.   Most are labeled "REC", "ANT" and TRANS", or something similar (see this photo).   A duplexer is built with a "higher" side and a "lower" side, and the loops and inter-cavity cabling are selected for those frequencies.   The application a ham has may conflict with the original port labels.   Most commercial repeaters (definitely in UHF, usually on VHF) receive on the higher frequency and transmit on the lower frequency, whereas amateur repeaters can swing either way.   So look at the original label and note if the receive side is the higher of the two frequencies, or if the transmit side is... and keep the high / low relationship the same as you retune it.   You may end up using the original receive side as your transmit side.   Personally, I remove the factory "Receiver" and "Transmitter" labels and replace them with my own permanent labels reading "High Side Pass" and "Low Side Pass", then I add temporary "Receiver" and "Transmitter" labels for each application. This is expecially true on UHF GMRS (+ offset) and on UHF amateur (- offset in Southern California, Oregon, Denver, and many other areas).   Some manufacturers have gone to even more detail with connector markings that read "pass low, reject high" on one side and "pass high, reject low" on the other.

Interestingly, if you order a untuned duplexer it arrives appropriately labeled... see this photo.

The cable length between the cavities in a duplexer is very, very critical, and the actual length of any one cable is dependent on both cable velocity factor and frequency. On a UHF duplexer the optimum length is different between the receive and transmit side. And the lengths of the cables between the duplexer ports and the antenna "T" fitting are also very critical and frequency dependent. Many duplexers are wider in frequency than their harnesses - for example if you move a VHF duplexer from 160 MHz or 170 MHz to 2 meters you will have to aquire a new harness kit, or lengthen the old one. Hams that are moving a 470 MHz duplexer to 440 MHz will have the same problem.

Double-shielded silver-plated coax is the best thing to use to connect duplexers.   For example, RG-214 has two silver-plated braids and a silver-plated inner conductor for maximum noise rejection.   Avoid coax types that have disimilar metals rubbing against each other such as LMR-(any 3-digit or 4-digit number) or Belden 9913, both of which use an aluminum foil shield rubbing against a copper braid.   Many amateurs have purchased LMR-400 or similar cable, installed it, and it works fine (for a while).   They just rave about how good it is.   Then anything from 9 months to 5 years later they find themselves taking it down as the cable itself causes "duplex noise" (see the article titled "Help!! I have a crackling noise in my repeater" by Kevin Custer W3KKC in the Antennas section on this page).   The expensive LMR cable gets reused somewhere else.   RG-142 and RG-400, both a smaller version of RG-214 but sharing the same construction, can also be used (but see the article on this page titled "Double Shielded Coax Cable, The differences between RG-142 and RG-400, and why you DON'T want to use RG-142..." by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY).   My personal preference is to use nothing but Heliax and Superflex on the antenna side of the duplexer, and nothing but Superflex and RG-400 on the radio side.   Yes, it's expensive, but like my dad said about tools, "Buying quality only hurts once".   Good cable is going to last a long, long, long time, and it's one less thing to worry about.   If you have to use coax then look at RG-393 for the large diameter (i.e RG-8/213/214 size) and RG-142/400 (RG58 size).   All are double shielded with silver plated shields and will not cause duplex noise.

The type of cable that is used between the duplexer and the recevier and transmitter is important.   Many manufacturers scrimp and use single-shielded cable, and in many cases get away with it.   The Motorola GR series repeaters and many of the Yaesu/Vertex VXR series repeaters were supplied with single-shield jumpers inside the cabinet, and this allows random desense to occur.   Replacing the factory jumpers with RG-400/U double-shielded coax eliminates that.   If you do make new cables, make them with the correct connectors on each end, so that you do not have to use any adapters.   All it takes is one nickel plated adapter to ruin your day.

NEVER EVER LIFT OR CARRY A DUPLEXER BY THE HARNESS.
Despite the fact that your UHF duplexer is the right size the harness is not a suitcase handle (if you need one then use a piece of rope).   The cable(s) in the harness can be easily stretched, which changes the dimensions and velocity factor, which changes the duplexer tuning and the system performance.   And never allow a cabling situation where there is tension (i.e. continuous strain or load) on any cable in the harness.   Look up "cold flow" (pertaining to plastics), and then think about the center conductor of the coax slowly migrating (moving) from the center of the coax to a point right adjacent to the shield, and how that would affect the cable impedance at that location.

LIKEWISE, THE CAVITY TUNING RODS ARE ADJUSTMENTS AND NOTHING ELSE
Never carry or support your duplexer by the tuning rods.   Treat the whole assembly as if it's as fragile as an eggshell.   If it's a high band unit use the factory design for the mounting frame.   If it's UHF, 900 MHz or 1200 MHz mount it by the rack ears.   If it's low band you are on your own - but treat it gently.

A note on small mobile duplexers from Eric Lemmon WB6FLY:
(Most "mobile duplexers" are notch-only, and are sometimes called notchplexers)
Most UHF mobile notch-only "flatpack" duplexers will work fine below 50 watts at a 5 MHz split- but their performance rapidly deteriorates when operated outside of their stated band limits. For example, a commercial-band mobile duplexer that was manufactured to operate in the 450-470 MHz band will likely perform poorly in the 440-450 MHz Amateur band. Although such a duplexer may SEEM to be working in the Ham 70 cm band, it may have excessive insertion loss that the owner may not realize. That's because the internal coupling loops are set at the factory during manufacture and not readily adjustable by the owner.

I once tried to use a commercial-band mobile duplexer on 70 cm in a portable repeater, and was disappointed in its performance- especially receive sensitivity at 441 MHz. I then ordered a new Celwave duplexer of the same model, but factory-tuned for my Amateur pair. What a difference! Once the new duplexer was installed, the receive range of the portable repeater was significantly improved, with no other changes.

Other people report no problems with moving flatpacks to 440 MHz or even 420 MHz, it all depends on the original design of the particular duplexer.   A goods test, and a real eye-opener, is to measure the performance, especially the insertion loss, at the original design frequencies and then again on the your new frequencies.

Above all remember that notch-only duplexers are not appropriate for high level RF sites as they provide zero protection for the receiver from any other transmitter - they are designed to protect a single repeater from itself, and nothing else (and remember the "higher side" and "lower side" rule above).

DUPLEXERS - An Introductory Tutorial   by Jack Daniel KD6YVL     (offsite link)
This is a nice writeup that should be titled "Duplexers 101".   Well worth reading.
Theory and Testing of Duplexers   by Jacques Audet VE2AZX
This is a large (60 pages) technical writeup that should be titled "Duplexers 102".   Again, well worth reading.
Technical Duplexer Page with good theory and explanations, and some homebrew construction notes. By John Portune W6NBC
Understanding, Maintaining & Re-Tuning Antenna Duplexers 145kb PDF   By William F. Lieske, Sr., Founder, EMR Corporation
A good basic theory writeup, including the differences between Band Pass and Band Reject.   The original copy at the EMR web site
Combating Spurious Output And Overloading With Cavity Filters   1.2mb PDF   by TX-RX Corp.
A "Seminar Series" writeup that covers the theory behind cavity filters - mandatory reading for those unfamiliar with them.
Coaxial Resonators, Applied theory and practice, with photos   by Mike Pinfold, ZL1BTB
Interference Control Through The Use Of Cavity Filters And Ferrite Isolators   900kb PDF   by TX-RX Corp.
Technical Notes on Duplexer Problems and Remedies 1mb PDF   By TX-RX Corp.
The Design of High Isolation Duplexers And A New Antenna For Duplex Systems   755 KB PDF
An IEEE Transactions publication from March 1965 by W. B> Bryson of Communications Products Company, a division of Phelps Dodge.
A Guide to Duplexer Specifications   over 130 different models, by Paul Kelley N1BUG (Contributions to the list are very welcome)
Tuning and Adjusting Vari-Notch-Duplexers   185kb PDF   by TX-RX Corp.
A "Seminar Series" writeup that covers the theory behind cavity filters and isolators.
T-Pass Expandable Cavity Muticoupler System   500kb PDF   by TX-RX Corp.
A "Seminar Series" writeup that covers the various type of cavity-based multicouplers and the T-Pass design.
The Hybrid Ring Duplexer   A comprehensive explanation of the Hybrid Ring, by Kevin Custer W3KKC
Six Meter Heliax Duplexer Design   by Jim Poll, WB5WPA   (off-site link)
Here's one implementation of the above design   by Oscar KF6YB (off-site link)
Here's another implementation of the above design   by Mike Perryman K5JMP (off-site link)
Six Meter Heliax Receive Filter Construction and Testing article based on the above designs, by Robert Meister WA1MIK and David Malicki N1OFJ. Note that this is NOT a full duplexer; just the receive half.
Using open stubs to notch interference   By Nico PAØNHC   (offsite link)
An excellent article on reducing paging transmitter (and others) interference into 2m repeaters.
Note that common European usage is that a comma is used where Westerners use a period to mark decimals, for example 144.550 MHz is written as 144,550 MHz so readers used to the period will have to do some mental "translation".   In this article Nico has used a mix of both forms so it can be a little confusing on the first read.
GE Datafile Bulletin 10002-1, A 25-250 MC Quarter Wave Stub Filter   General Electric produced several useful DataFile Bulletins (the ones we have are available for free download from the GE LBI page at this web site). This one is a 400KB PDF file, and is subtitled:
"Even though General Electric Two Way Radio Transmitters well exceed FCC requirements for spurious radiation, the 60-80-db sprious attenuation provided may, in a few situations, be insufficicient to provent interference. This bulletin describes the construction of a filter, useful for supressing spurious radiation at one specific frequency...."
Someone say 6 meter duplexer?   A comprehensive conversion of a lowband pass cavity to BpBr by Jeff DePolo WN3A...
How do I tune this notch duplexer?   by Kevin Custer W3KKC
A Homemade Duplexer for 2-Meter Repeaters   by John Bilodeau, W1GAN (from the July 1972 QST magazine)
Note: In the 30-plus years since this article was written, the spring-contact based BNC has fallen out of favor.   Type N connectors are much preferred over BNC connectors as they depend on a silver-to-silver screw compression contact, plus they can handle more power.   You must use double shielded coax in the harness.   RG-55 is mentioned in the article, I'd use RG-400 and compensate on the inter-cavity lengths.   If anybody has built this unit with better connectors and modern cable, and would like to update this article please let me know.
Tests of the DCI VHF and UHF 4-pole bandpass filters  by Robert W. Meister WA1MIK
These filters definitely do the job, meeting or exceeding manufacturer's specs. They cover the entire 144-148 and 440-450 MHz bands and have sharp cutoffs. If you need more filtering, they also sell 6, 8, and 10-pole filters with attenuations over 80dB. These handle 200 watts and can be used at repeater sites.

  RFS / Celwave     See also Phelps-Dodge, as Cellwave bought that company and continued many of their products under the Cellwave name.   Click here for Celwave antennas
  Celwave model 696, 696SR (UHF), 896 or 896SR (800-960 MHz) Duplexer   86Kb PDF file   Donated by Allan Crites WA9ZZU, scanned by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
  Celwave Duplexer Cable Harness Lengths (oriented for printing)   44Kb PDF file   Donated by A. Nony Mous

  Decibel Products   Click here for DB antennas
Data Sheet on DB's line of power dividers - Three page PDF 264kb donated by John Lock KFØM
This writeup covers the K522 & K542 for 144-174 MHz, the K526 & K546 for 406-512 MHz, the K528 & K548 for 800-960 MHz and the K528M & K548M for 1850-1990 MHz
DB's pipe and tower mounting clamp kit DB365-OS   Early version donated by John Lock KFØM
DB's pipe and tower mounting clamp kit DB365-OS & ASPR616     (later version)
Installation and Tuning Instructions for DB Band Pass Cavity Filters   50kb   While this is oriented to the DB4001 (148-174 MHz), DB4002 (118-512 MHz), DB4011 (70-88 MHz), DB4013 (88-118 MHz), DB4015 (118-148 MHz), DB4020 (406-420 MHz), DB4018 (225-400 MHz), DB4021 (406-512 MHz), DB4026 (406-512 MHz), DB4028 (806-960 MHz), DB4042 (30-50 MHz), DB4170 (138-174 MHz), DB4171 (450-512 MHz) models this information is pretty generic information.
Field Tuning Instructions for Dual Junction Tunable Isolators   one-page 21kb PDF file by Decibel Products
Tuning Instructions for the DB4022 (UHF) & 4029 (800 MHz) band pass / band reject cavities   31kb   A two-page PDF file
DB 4023 UHF duplexer (3 cavity) and 4081 (4 cavity) spec sheet   donated by W. M. Kahl N6KYD
Tuning Instructions for the DB4030 (four cavity) and 4032 (six cavity) Low Band Duplexers   five page 920Kb PDF donated by W. M. Kahl N6KYD
    Tuning Instructions for the DB4030 and 4032 4-cavity and 6-cavity Low Band Duplexers   24kb   A two-page PDF file (appears to be a later version of the five page one above)
    Converting the DB-4032 Low Band Duplexer to the 6M Amateur Band   29kb image   A one-page writeup from DB Engineering on converting the DB-4032 to the 6-meter amateur band   It's a scan of a fax so it's not perfect, but it's quite readable (oriented for printing)
Same drawing sized to be printed on 11x17 paper   Both donated by Chris Nicholson N9LLO
Installation and Alignment Instructions for the DB4036 (mid-band), 4044 and 4046 (high-band) Base Station Duplexers   47kb 
A two-page PDF file describing wide-spaced (3 MHz and 5 MHz) duplexers that are not of much use to hams, but would be to public safety and disaster services folks.
DB 4048 duplexer specs (high band - 146-174 MHz) - an eight page PDF file 
    DB4048 duplexer review article from June 1975 QST magazine -     Page 1     Page 2     Scan courtesy of Glenn Little WB4UIV
Installation and Tuning Instructions for the DB4055 & 4056 (high band), 4067 & 4068 (406-420 UHF) and 4071 & 4072 (450-470 UHF) duplexers  40 KB   A two-page PDF file
        Here's a photo of the internals of a 4072 housing.
Installationa and Tuning on Decibel Products 4057 (three cavity) and 4058 (four cavity) high band duplexers   Two page 120kb PDF donated by A. Nony Mous
Catalog sheet on the DB4060 & 4062 Band Pass / Band Reject duplexers   55kb PDF
    Installation and Tuning Instructions for the DB4060 & 4062 Band Pass / Band Reject duplexers   46kb   A two-page PDF file (the DB4060 has 4 cavities, the 4062 has 6 cavities)
    Repair of the DB4060 & 4062 Band Pass / Band Reject duplexers   46kb   An article by Bernie K5BP detailing notch capacitor replacement for these units, including a source for the original component.
    Repair of the DB4060 & 4062 Band Pass / Band Reject duplexers   An offsite web page by N1BUG... he writes:
I have a DB-4062, which is the 6 cavity version of the 4060. It was old when I placed it in service in 1997 but worked OK. Over the years it just slowly deteriorated until it became essentially unusable. Finally I took the thing apart to investigate, and was able to restore it to excellent function after 15-20 hours of work. I created a web page that covered my experience...
Specifications and Data on the DB4075 and DB4076 UHF Bandpass Reject duplexers   Photo   423kb
Tuning and Installation Information on the DB4075 and DB4076 UHF Bandpass Reject duplexers   91kb
Tuning Information on the DB4090 806-960 MHz Bandpass Reject duplexers   43kb
Installation and Tuning Instructions for the DB4104 (low band), 4040 (high band) and 4075 (UHF) single-cavity notch filters   25kb   A two-page PDF file
Installation and Tuning Instructions for the 4307, 4308 and 4309 Hybrid Couplers   14kb   PDF file.
Installation and Tuning Instructions for the DB4318H-2C Single Channel Filter and Isolator   10kb   A two-page PDF file describing a 164-168.5 MHz unit but the directions apply to similar units.

Motorola
Info on the T-1480 series high band 4-can duplexer / cavity filter panel   1.14Mb PDF file of the official Moto manual that covers the two-cavity and four-cavity models (1481, 1482, 1485A, 1485AF, 1487A, 1487AF)
Info on the T1500 series UHF 4-can duplexer / cavity filter panel   There's quite a bit of info, so it has it's own web page that covers the T1500, T1501, T1502, T1503, T1504, T1505, T1506 and T1507 units.

Phelps-Dodge
PD-506 manual   263 Kb PDF   Donated by Allan Crites WA9ZZU, scanned by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
NOTE: You CANNOT tell from the model number if a PD-506 is for 144-174 or for 220-225 MHz ! You have to look at the frequency label !
This is a 4-cavity pass-notch duplexer than is supplied as either a 144-174 or 220-225 MHz version. At high band it will work from 600 KHz to 7 MHz separation, and at 220 it will work at from 1 to 5 MHz separation. Rejection is specified at 80 db, and under 2 db insertion loss.
PD-522-509    
Does anyone have the spec sheet, the tuning instructions or can supply a couple of photos?
This is a popular 6-cavity UHF duplexer that is built as a 4+2 unit (i.e. four cavities on one side and two on the other. If you set it on the table so that the single coax connector is on the left, and the two are on the right, the layout is in the sequence of: TXnotch--cable--RXpass--cable--RXpass--cable--TXnotch--cable--RXnotch--cable--TXpass, with the first 4 cavities on the receive side and the last two on the transmit side.
PD-526     Photo 1     Photo 2
This is a 6 Cavity UHF Repeater-Base Station Duplexer that is an outstanding performer.
Specs:
    Frequency Coverage = 435 to 470 MHz.
    Minimum Frequency Spacing, MHz. = 3
    Minimum TX to RX Isolation, dB = 100
    Maximum Insertion Loss, dB = 1.0
    TX Bandwidth, MHz. = 0.025
    RX Bandwidth, MHz. = 0.025
    Maximum Power Input = 250 watts
    Connectors = "N" Female
    VSWR, Max. (50 ohms) = 1.3:1
Eric Lemmon WB6FLY wrote: This duplexer is a Motorola part number 0185417U05 unit, which has a current (mid 2009) dealer price of $ 1,173.00. It is made for Motorola by RFS/Celwave, which sells the same unit as PD526-4-2. It is the X182AD Option for Quantar, Quantro, and MTR2000 stations. I have an identical unit in service on a 100 watt UHF MTR2000 repeater, and it is an excellent performer. Prior to installation, I verified that its isolation was better than the 120 dB specified- a very good figure.
PD-638-509-6 manual   263 Kb PDF   Donated by Allan Crites WA9ZZU, scanned by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
This is a 6-cavity pass-notch mobile duplexer that is available as a 150-162, 162-174, 220-225, or 471-512 MHz unit.
- 150-162 or 162-174 MHz: 150 watts, 75db rejection, 1.2 dB insertion loss at 2 MHz spacing. At 5 MHz the insertion loss drops to 0.7 dB.
- 220-225 MHz: 100 watts, 75db rejection, 2 dB insertion loss at 1.6 MHz spacing.
- 470-512 MHz: 75 watts, 75db rejection, 1.7 dB insertion loss at 3 MHz spacing.
PD5042-1 VHF Duplexer data from Motorola   960 Kb PDF   scanned by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
Motorola duplexer 0185417U01 covers 132-146 MHz, 0185417U02 covers 144-160 MHz, and 0185417U03 covers 158-174 MHz. These are all relabeled Celwave model PD5042-1-50 duplexers and are a factory option with VHF Quantar or MTR2000 stations.
PD-7540, PD-7560, PD-7640, PD-7660 duplexer manual   109 Kb   This unit is also called the "MiniPlexer".
This is a UHF flat-pack mobile notch-only duplexer that is limited to 40 watts and comes in two ranges: 406-435 and 435-470 MHz and in 4 can or 6-can versions (7n40=4-can, 7n60=6-can). The 4-can version provides 50 dB rejection and 1 dB insertion loss at 5 MHz spacing, and the 6-can version provides 75 dB and 1.3 dB. Like any notch-only duplexer, any frequency outside the notches rides right through...   Donated by A. Nony Mous.
PD-7540, PD-7560, PD-7640, PD-7660 duplexer manual   518 Kb
This is a later verion of the same manual, with enough new information to be worth having both versions available. Donated by Allan Crites WA9ZZU, scanned by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY.

Sinclair Labs
P-Series Duplexer Specifications Sheet   Covering the P-1C01-G, P-1C02G, P-201G, P202G, P203G, P-301G, P-302G, P-303G models   by Sinclair Corporation.
Sinclair Q202-G cable harness drawing   88 KB courtesy of WB6FLY
A while back, Eric set up a Q202G duplexer for a local radio club. The duplexer was originally made for and used on a commercial pair in the 152-157 MHz band, and no matter how much work was spent on tinung the duplexer it would not perform. He had the club purchase a new low-split harness from Sinclair. When it arrived, he took careful measurements of both the new and the old harness, and the results are here... If the harness on your duplexer is the high-split version, with about 12 inches between tee centers, you will never be able to achieve optimum peformance on 2m, and especially in the 145 repeater range. Some people "stretch" the cables by adding 90 degree elbow adapters to the ends as a test, but end up buying or making a new harness. The factory-made harness uses Delta brand crimped connectors, and costs about $250. Eric commented that "If I were to do this again, I would consider fabricating the harness myself, with genuine Delta connectors and tees, which can be purchased for a total of around $120". If you do, don't forget to use real mil-spec RG-214 or RG-393 coax with the silver plating.
Tuning instructions for "P" and "Q" series cavity duplexers, and FP, FR, FQ series cavities   manual CM-1008 by Sinclair Corporation.
Tuning instructions for the Q-202G, Q-208G, Q-218G, 2B02G, Q-2B02G, Q-2B17G series cavity duplexers   manual FP-1032 by Sinclair Corporation.
Catalog sheet and Specifications for the 6-cavity Res-Lock Q-Circuit VHF Duplexer
Tuning instructions for the Q-Series, ResLok 4 - Q‑circuit Duplexers - manual number CM-351.
Written on the front is "Sincl Q2330E"
Installation and Tuning instructions for the Q‑Circuit Res-Lock Duplexers - manual number CM-1009.
This manual covers the Q-1220E (66‑88 MHz), Q-2220E (132‑174 MHz), Q-2222E (148‑174 MHz), Q-3220E (406‑512 MHz) and Q-4220E (806‑960 MHz) duplexers.
Photos of a new coupling loop for a 2220E: Photo 1     Photo 2     Photo 3     Photo 4
Duplexer Tuning Instructions for the R101G to R116G and R-1C01-G, R-1C02G, R-1A01G models   (manual number CM-159):
Note: This manual also covers a large number of other models in the 2H-30, 2H-37, 2H-43, 2H-66, 2H-77, H-30, H-37, H-43, H-66 and H-77 series.   The actual list is on the first page.
Modification of R101, R104, or R110 for amateur 6 meter operation   (manual number CI-051).
Hybrid Ring Duplexer Tuning Instructions   (manual CM-106) (theory on the W2EUP-designed Sinclair Hybrid Ring Duplexer).
MR-354, MR-356 and MR-3332 406-512 MHz mobile duplexer catalog sheet   191kb JPG file - scan of a catalog page.
Mobile duplexer MR-354 Specification Sheet   2-page 88kb PDF file donated by Ted Maczulat VE7TFM
Mobile duplexer MR-356 Specification Sheet   2-page 87kb PDF file
MR series mobile duplexer tuning   (manual number CM-1010)   150kb PDF
Covers the MR-254 and MR-256 (high band, 4.5-10Mhz separation), MR-354 and MR-356 (UHF, 5-10Mhz separation), MR-454 and MR-456 (806-952 MHz, up to 45 MHz separation) units. Note that these duplexers are rated at 50 watts or less. The high band units are built for 148-160 MHz and 160-174 MHz splits, the UHF are built for 406-450 MHz and 440-512 MHz splits, and the 800/900 units are built for 806-890 MHz and 928-952 MHz splits.
SRL-101C Low band antenna information   The sheet says "30-50 MHz" but gives info on 30-90 MHz.   440kb PDF file.
SRL-229 High band antenna information
Epoxy Procedure   167kb PDF
Base Pipe   61kb PDF
Installation Instructions   143kb PDF
Mounting Detail   92kb PDF
"FP", "FR", "FQ" Series Bandpass Filters Product Description   Page 1 34.2kb     Page 2 28.9kb     Donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY.
"FP" Series Electrical Specs 27kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"FR" Series Electrical Specs 31kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"FQ" Series Electrical Specs 30kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"FP", "FR", "FQ" Series Tuning 48kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"FP" Series Tuning 61kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"FR" Series Tuning 68kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"FQ" Series Tuning 71kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"FP", "FR", "FQ" Series Parts 23kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"P", "Q", "R" Series Description 37kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"P" Series Electrical Specs 40kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"Q" Series Electrical Specs 41kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"P" and "Q" Series Preliminary Tuning 32kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"P" and "Q" Series Outlines 42kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"P" Series Retuning 58kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"Q" Series Tuning 86kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"P" and "Q" Series Parts 33kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"C" Series Description 53kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"C" Series Systems 79kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"C" Series Electrical Specs 59kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"C" Series Mechanical Specs 64kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"C" Series Curves 49kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"C" Series Typical Systems 67kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"C" Series Tuning 49kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
"C" Series Parts 71kb PDF file donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

Telewave
TPRD-series Duplexer Tuning Instructions   50Kb PDF file donated by A. Nony Mous
Generic tuning instructions for their pass/reject duplexers.
TPRD-1554 & 1556 Duplexers   92Kb PDF file donated by A. Nony Mous
These are VHF pass-reject duplexers good for 350 watts. The TPRD-1554 is VHF 4 cavity and the 1556 is 6 cavity.
TPRD-4544 & 4744 Duplexers   104Kb PDF file donated by A. Nony Mous
UHF 4 cavity pass-reject, 250watts.   The 4544 model is for 400-470 MHz, the 4744 is for 470-512 MHz.
TPRD-9044 Duplexer   88Kb PDF file donated by A. Nony Mous
890-960 MHz 4 cavity pass-reject, 250 watts
If 4 cavities are enough in your RF environment then this is an ideal unit for 900 MHz amateur repeaters.

TX-RX
Overview of TX-RX Low Band Duplexers 2 mb PDF   Also has some Tech Aid documents
Overview of TX-RX High Band & 220 MHz Duplexers 2 mb PDF   Includes a chart explaining their model numbering system
Hint: The center digit pair are the magic numbers:
13=30-40 MHz,   14=38-50 MHz,   29=88-108 MHz,   36=132-150 MHz,   37=144-174 MHz,   38=132-174 MHz,   41=148-174 MHz,   52=215-250 MHz,   65=406-430 MHz,   66=442-450 MHz, and 97=1215-1300 MHz.
Data Sheet on the TX-RX model 28-37-02A 144-175 MHz duplexer 2.7 mb PDF
If a 4-cavity model is enough for your situation, this is the ideal model for a 2m repeater - it will handle 400 watts at 500 KHz spacing with 85 db of isolation.   Otherwise look at the 28-37-11, it's the 6-cavity version with 100 db.
Instruction Manual Vari-Notch Duplexers (6" Cavities)   189 kb PDF
While this is a generic manual on the TX-RX duplexers it contains a chart saying it pertains to the following units:
28-13-01F (30-40 MHz),   28-14-01F (38-50 MHz),   28-28-02A/G (66-88 MHz),   28-36-02A/G (132-150 MHz),   28-36-11E/G (132-150 MHz),   28-37-02A/G (144-174 MHz),   28-37-11E/G (144-174 MHz),   28-37-08G (144-174 MHz),   28-65-01A (406-430 MHz),   28-65-05A/G (406-430 MHz),   28-70-01A (450-470 MHz),   28-70-07A/G (450-470 MHz),   28-69-01A (470-512 MHz),   28-69-04A (470-512 MHz)

WACOM and Remec
WACOM started out as Waco Communications in Waco, Texas. At some point WACOM was bought by Remec, and in November of 2001 was sold to TX-RX.
Notes on the Wacom WP-641 BpBr Cavity   by Kevin Custer W3KKC
Field Tuning Instructions for Remec WP-604, WP-609, WP-612, WP-621, WP-629, WP-639 and WP-641 VHF Duplexers   donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
Field Tuning Instructions for Wacom WP-604, WP-609, WP-612, WP-621, WP-629, WP-639, WP-641 and WP-652 units   donated by Ivan OZ1HYG
This is an earlier version of the above file (it's from Wacom), and the instructions are a little different.
Field Tuning Instructions for Wacom WP-678-R2 and WP-665-R2 UHF Duplexers   donated by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
Spec Sheet for WP-604 (low band, 4-cavity)   371kb PDF
Spec Sheet for WP-621 and WP-641 (high band, 4-cavity)   218kb PDF
Spec Sheet for WP-623 and WP-643 (high band, 6-cavity)   178kb PDF
Spec Sheet for WP-629 and WP-639 (high band, 4-cavity)   188kb PDF
Spec Sheet for WP-652 and WP-653 (220mc, 4-cavity)   248kb PDF   This is the March 1997 version of the sheet.
The September 1985 version (no image yet) has a few differences: the older sheet says 220-300 MHz, 1.0 MHz min. spacing, 350 watts max, gray enamel finish.
The newer sheet says 210-260 MHz, 1.0 MHz min. spacing, 200 watts max, black enamel finish.
The frequency response charts look identical, as do the loss & isolation specs.
Spec Sheet for WP-665 and WP-678 (UHF, 4-cavity)   215kb PDF
WP-687-3943 Catalog Sheet (900 MHz, 4-cavity)   145kb GIF
WP-687-3943 Spec Sheet (900 MHz, 4-cavity)   1.65mb PDF
WP-687-3943 Test Sheet (900 MHz, 4-cavity)   1.35mb PDF
WP-687-3943 Field Tuning Instructions (900 MHz, 4-cavity)   409kb PDF
WP-4941-7941 Spec Sheet (900 MHz, 2-cavity)   2Mb PDF

Antennas
Repeater owners tend to have favorite antennas - some prefer colinear antennas ("fiberglass sticks"), others prefer dipole arrays. Personally I prefer grounded dipole arrays. Colinear antenas are more prone to duplex noise (see the "crackling" article below), dipole arrays are immune to that but can have phasing harness degredation if you are not careful. Picture four loop dipoles side mounted on a steel mast. Suddenly one day you notice that the coverage has gone to hell. When you check the antenna with a SWR bridge you discover that you still have a 1:1 SWR. Phasing is the key concept here. The RF is fed to the dipoles by means of a cable harness of critical-length coaxial lines that accomplish both the phasing of the dipoles and RF power division. The VERTICAL pattern of the antenna is determined partly by the RF phase relationship between the dipoles. When the antenna is new, the phase relationships are perfect and the RF goes where you want it. As the antenna ages, moisture can infiltrate the coax and connectors unless your waterproofing is perfect. The moisture deteriorates the coax dielectric and corrodes any non-silver-plated center conductor and braid. This degredation will slowly cause the vertical pattern (and therefore the gain) of the antenna to change. A perfect SWR does you no good when your RF power is going straight up in the air or straight down into the ground! So if you use a dipole array then you want to be an annoying perfectionist about the phasing harness, the waterproofing of the cable, and of the connectors on it.

And as said above, don't go cheap on the antenna or feedline. You can have the best sounding repeater on the planet, but it's both worthless and useless if the users can't get into it or hear it because you used a Ringo Ranger 15 feet off the ground and RG-213-type feedline (don't laugh, I've seen it).

Radio Antenna Engineering   By Edmund A. Laport   This is a 1952 textbook and the original copyright has expired. The PDF file is 38.5 Mb. At the time, Mr. Laport was the Chief Engineer of RCA International Division. While the book is oriented towards antennas up to 30 MHz, the Preface is worth reading (4 pages) as theory doesn't depend that much on wavelength. The Introduction (11 pages) has some math, but it's also very interesting.
The W1GHZ Online Microwave Antenna Book   By Paul Wade W1GHZ (ex N1BWT)   An excellent text, and worth reading.     (offsite link)
Antenna Design for Omnidirectional Repeater Coverage   By James Ruxlow N9SN
What do you do when you need omni coverage, and you have to side mount the antenna to a triangular tower that is over fifteen feet on each face? The Western Illinois ARC figured it out. And their solution works well.
Precipitation Static and Duplex Radio... The Phenomena and the Cure!   Rain and snow clouds contain more than rain and snow   By Kevin Custer W3KKC.
Help!! I have a crackling noise in my repeater   Why it's there and how to cure it...   By Kevin Custer W3KKC.
Vertical and Horizontal antenna separation charts   Provided by Kevin Custer W3KKC.
440 MHz Folded Dipole Repeater Antenna   (222kb PDF file)   This is a two page PDF file of the classic 73 Magazine construction article by Chuck Kelsey WB2EDV - Yes, you can build yourself a DB-224 folded dipole array.
Information on a Cycloid Dipole (also known as circular polarization) antennas   By the WA7X crew     (offsite link)
"Calculating Downtilt" by Scala Division of Kathrein Corp (Technical Bulletin #112)   39kb PDF
Omni-Directional Gain Vertical Collinear Construction Project     By Mike Collis WA6SVT
Yes, you too can build a Stationmaster - for any frequency from 2 meters to 1.3 GHz
Some variations and constructions ideas on the WA6SVT collinear   by Kevin Custer W3KKC
One ham's experiences with the WA6SVT antenna   by Paul Kelly N1BUG
Here's the construction article promised in the above article   by Paul Kelly N1BUG
Build A 9 dB, 70cm, Collinear Antenna From Coax   By Michael Martell N1HFX   (offsite link)
Yes, you can build a decent home base station antenna from RG-58 coax.
Fiberglass Antenna Painting Procedure   by Celwave Corp., provided by Mike Dees N3EZD   See the next article as well.
  Some Notes on Fiberglass Antenna Painting   Comments from several folks that accompany the above article.
Retuning a Stationmaster type antenna   By Jim Barbour WD8CHL
Cheap Yagi Antennas for VHF/UHF   By Kent Britain, WA5VJB for the Clear Lake Amateur Radio Club of Houston, Texas.
This article describes a easy-to-build inexpensive yagi (beam) antenna that can be built for 2m, 220, 440, 900 or 1296 MHz.
A QST article on a homebrew discone   375 KB PDF file from the May 2003 issue
The article describes it as 144 through 450 MHz but it would work just fine at CAP (just plug 139 MHz into the sizing formula) and at GMRS frequencies. I'd use copper screening, not steel hardware cloth. And discones aren't limited to 2m and up, as this photo of a commercial 25-75 MHz discone will show (photo by WA6ILQ). While it looks like the support mast is on a rooftop air conditioner, it is actually mounted into a tripod base about 20 feet on the far side of the unit. A search of the QST archives shows an article on constructing a 40 through 10 meter discone in the July 1975 issue and a followup/correction in September.
A Copper Cactus Dual-Band J-Pole Antenna Project   By Tony Petersen N7QVC
If anyone has any other good homebrew antenna projects let me know.
There is a section on mobile antennas towards the bottom of this web page.

  Advanced Electronic Applications / AEA
For information on AEA antennas including the Isopole please see the AEA page.

  Celwave
  A detailed drawing by Skipp of the Celwave-built Motorola TDE6090A welded yagi beam antenna   69KB PDF file   This is a two page PDF, the first page is Skipp's measurements, the second is the Celwave drawing.   There is enough information here that anyone with a welder could make their own very strong winter-ice-proof welded 10db gain yagi antenna.   Note that the element length measurements shown in the diagram are for 420 MHz frequencies.
If you need a good strong UHF point-to-point link antenna then use this design as your model.

 
Decibel Products / RFS
IMPORTANT !! A letter suffix indicates the range that an antenna is built for: 138-150 MHz, 150-160 MHz, 155-165 MHz, or 164-174 MHz but that the lettering is NOT consistent across the product line, nor is the actual frequencies. For example, on one product (i.e. one model number) an "A" model might be 150-159 MHz, while on another an "A" model might be 150-155 MHz. While in many cases an "A" range is the one that starts at 150 MHz, it can vary with EACH antenna model number: one antenna might have "A" be the 138-150 MHz range, and another might have "E" be the 138-150 MHz range. Be very careful that you check your range letter definition before you spend your money (on new or used antennas) !
Data sheet on the DB201 ground plane omni antenna   717kb PDF file
This is the so-called "bent-over" ground plane that comes in two models: one for 30-174 MHz and the other for 220-512 MHz.
Cutting chart for the DB-201     Page 1 159kb   Page 2 111kb   Courtesy Russ Stafford W3CH
A poor scan of the data sheet on the DB-212 side mount omni antenna (33-88 MHz)
Page 1 260kb   Page 2 203kb   Drawing of the diagram on Page 2 34kb
Here's the Andrew version of the same catalog sheet (and a much better scan), courtesy of Allen Wilde N1IOE
and here's the DB-212 tower mounting instructions, also courtesy of Allen Wilde N1IOE
  You can move a low band DB212 to 6m by basically freeing up the trombone section of the antenna, adjusting the postion, then locking it down again. Just measure the current length of the dipole and then multiply this length by (current-freq divided by the new-freq). So if the current length is 184 inches and the current freq is 46 MHz and your destination frequency is 52.5 MHz the new length (in inches) is therefore 184*(46/52.5).... To change the length you will need to remove the pop-rivet and a little dimple that the production line uses to hold the trombone in place until the rivet is installed. Sometimes the VSWR depends on the tower face. If you want to super tune the antenna set the antenna up on a tower leg several feet off the ground, preferrably a little over a 1/2 wave if you can do it. Then adjust the trombone to the length you calculated and apply a little RF power and check the reflected power. Then get a long stick and start moving the trombone slowly while watching the reflected power. When you get the best possible VSWR, stop and redo the rivets. Personally I'd add a bead of non-acidic silicone bathub sealer to water-seal the joint.
Detailed measured diagram of the low-band four-element DB-212 wiring harness     Courtesy Bill Cotter N4LG.
WA1ZYX's web page about modifying the DB-212 elements for 6 meters     Off-site Link.
Detailed harness lengths for various DB-222 multi-bay antennas     Courtesy of Paul Dumdie W9DWP.
DB-224 catalog data (PDF files): Decibel DB224 Data Sheet  156kb   Andrew DB224 Data Sheet  140kb   DB224 Instruction Sheet  153kb
Here's the instruction sheet that comes in the box with the DB-224   Page 1 964kb   Page 2 1,032kb   Page 3 819kb   Courtesy John Lock KFØM.
The DB224 is the standard antenna that all other 2m /  high band repeater antennas are measured against.   These guys cost a little more than a fiberglass antenna but will easily last 20-30 years, and don't have the cracked joint duplex noise problem, nor will you have a pile of fiberglass toothpicks on the ground after a nearby lightning strike.   How many Hustler, Comet or Diamond antennas will you go through in 20-30 years?
The DB-224 is rated at 80 MPH winds, but that's wishful thinking unless you side mount it with clamps on BOTH the top AND the bottom.   Frankly, chosing to mount your antenna on the tower top only to get a few extra feet isn't worth a bent or broken support tube, and if your antenna is side mounted (even if the tip is only 6 feet down from the tower top) the tower itself (or someone else's antenna) can be the lightning rod and take the hit.
Note that all "DB-224"s are not the same... they may all be tower-mounted exposed dipole arrays with 6 to 8db of gain (depending on the pattern), it's the suffix letter that is important:
  • the DB224-A model is 150-160 MHz circular pattern,
  • the DB224-B model is 155-165 MHz circular pattern,
  • the DB224-C model is 164-174 MHz circular pattern,
  • the DB224-E model is 138-150 MHz circular pattern (but try and find one second hand...),
  • the DB224-FAA model is 127-141 MHz circular pattern (it can be shortened to 2m),
  • the DB224-F model is 160-170 MHz circular pattern,
  • the DB224-J model is 276-285 MHz circular pattern,
  • and the DB224-JJ model is 220-225 MHz circular pattern,

  • the DB224E-A model is 150-160 MHz offset pattern,
  • the DB224E-B model is 155-165 MHz offset pattern,
  • the DB224E-C model is 164-174 MHz offset pattern,
  • the DB224E-E model is 138-150 MHz offset pattern (again, try and find one second hand...),
  • and the DB224E-JJ model is 220-225 MHz offset pattern,

  • The DB224 series can be ordered as a single or dual antenna. Just modify the model number by adding an "S" in the right spot - a DB224-JJ single antenna becomes a DB224S-JJ as a dual antenna.   It amounts to separating the elements into two independent antennas on the same mast.   Each antenna has a separate feedline terminated at the bottom of the mast. A DB224ES-A or DB224ES-JJ is a dual antenna with the offset pattern.
A detailed drawing of the DB-224-A and DB-224-E   104kb PDF file   A 2-page PDF donated by Skipp.   Note that the element length measurements are shown for both the "A" (150-160 MHz) range and the "E" (138-150 MHz) range. There is enough information here that anyone with some experience bending aluminum tubing can build one for themselves.
Another detailed drawing of the DB-224-E   60kb PDF file   Donated by Doug Zastrow WBØUPJ.   Note that the element length measurements shown in the diagram are for 136-150 MHz frequencies.
Conversion calculations for moving your DB224 to a different band split.   90kb PDF file   All of the magic calculations plus coax types necessary to redo your DB224's wiring harness and set the element length and spacing.
DB-228 catalog data (PDF files): DB228 Data Sheet  87kb   DB228 Instruction Sheet 60kb
Here's the instruction sheet that comes in the box with the DB-228   772kb PDF   Courtesy John Lock KFØM
Note that on this antenna an A suffix indicates 150-160 MHz, B=155-165 MHz, C=164-174 MHz and E=138-150 MHz.
The DB-228 is essentially two DB-224s on one 41-foot long mast, and can be ordered with a phasing harness that makes it one antenna - and that makes it the ultimate 2m repeater antenna (10 to 12db depending on the pattern).   The catalog sheet shows the "normal" mounting has being a split mount: the top half is above and the bottom half is below the top of a tower (i.e. the bottom half is side mounted with two clamps at the middle and bottom); however, unless you want to be the lightning rod the DB228 can be fully side mounted with the two brackets at top and bottom, or an optional third bracket can be added in the middle (I certainly would, especially in any area that has a problem with high winds, antenna icing, or both).
Or if you need extra RX-TX separation: order it with the -S (split kit) option and use it with two feedlines and a split duplexer as separate DB224 receiving and transmitting antennas.
DB's installation instruction sheet on the DB-264   155kb PDF   Courtesy of Paul Kelly N1BUG
The DB-264 is a 4 element dipole array that is constructed for any 10 MHz segment of 150-285 MHz.   This is the model that has the feed harness hidden inside the support pipe. I've seen one of these on 224 MHz, and it's rugged!
DB's instruction sheet on the DB-314   114kb PDF   Courtesy A. Nony Mous
The DB-314 is essentially a 8 UHF dipoles (a DB-408, 6.6db gain) and 4 high band dipoles (half of a DB-304, 3.2db) on the same mast, with separate feedlines.   If you need a commercial grade dual band antenna, this is it.   Or if you are limited to one antenna, then order this guy and use it as separate 2m and 440 antennas with two feedlines, or with a pair of commercial-grade TX-RX Corp. (or similar) "diplexers" that put both antennas on one feedline. But don't try and use one on a 147.09 MHz; repeater paired with a second repeater whose input is 441.275 MHz, or 147.36 MHz; and paired with 442.075 MHz; (do the math... and it doesn't matter what antenna you have in that situation).
Skipp's measurments drawing of the DB-402-B   26 KB PDF   An early 4 dipoles antenna. Measurements are for 450-470 MHz.
The DB-404 UHF dipole array is two pairs of UHF dipoles mounted to a mast.   Photo   Here is the factory data: (PDF files) DB 404 Data Sheet  93kb   DB 404 Instruction Sheet  131kb   Catalog sheet Page 1  879kb   Catalog sheet Page 2  568kb
A detailed drawing of the DB-404-B   Donated by Skipp.   Note that the element length measurements shown in the diagram are for 450-470 MHz frequencies.
A detailed drawing of the DB-404-D   Donated by Skipp.   Note that the element length measurements shown in the diagram are for 488-512 MHz frequencies.
The DB-408 is essentially two DB404s stacked on one longer mast (almost 9.5 feet long) and can be ordered with one or with two feedlines (the "split kit").   Specify Omni or Offset pattern when ordering, and if top or side mounting when ordering. For side mounting order the DB5012 mounting kit.
Here is the DB408 UHF dipole array factory data: DB408 Data Sheet  93kb   DB408 Instruction Sheet   80kb   (PDF files)
On this antenna the power limit is 250w, the frequency range A = 406-420, B = 450-470, C = 470-488, D = 488-512.
The "E" range is either 482-494 or 440-450 depending on which catalog you read, be very, very careful when ordering one. Do it by frequency range, not suffix letter.
A detailed drawing of the DB-408-B   300kb   Donated by Skipp.   Note that the element length measurements shown in the diagram are for 450-470 MHz frequencies.
DB411 UHF dipole array factory data: (PDF files) DB 411 Data Sheet  75kb     DB 411 Instruction Sheet  217kb
A detailed drawing of the DB-411-B   25kb PDF   Donated by Skipp.   Note that the element length measurements shown in the diagram are for 450-470 MHz frequencies.
The DB-420 is essentially two DB408s stacked on one longer mast and can be ordered with one or with two feedlines (the "split kit").   Specify Omni or Offset pattern, and if top or side mounting when ordering.
A drawing of the DB-420-B phasing harness   140 KB PDF
This is the 450-470 MHz version.   Anybody have a drawing (or the measurements) for 440-450 MHz ?
The data sheet on the DB420 UHF dipole array   113kb PDF file   The DB420 is an array of 8 dual dipoles that can be configured as a single 8-element antenna or as two 4-element antennas on the same mast (conversion requires a different harness).
The DB420 UHF dipole array Assembly and Mounting Instructions   145kb PDF file
Factory 1-page data sheet on the DB-492, DB-493 and DB-498 806-960 MHz Yagi beam antennas   130 KB PDF
This is the data sheet on the welded beams that are 6, 8 or 9DB. The 492 and 493 are light duty, the 498 is heavy duty. Phasing harnesses for 2 or 4 antennas are available for up to 15DB of gain.
Factory data sheet on the DB5004 / DB5030 Outrigger   378 KB PDF
This is the data sheet on the fiberglass outrigger that supports the Stationmaster and SuperStationmaster style fiberglass monopoles. You want to use at least one, in really high wind/bad weather areas I've seen two on a 21 foot SuperStationmaster).

  Motorola
  The 1964 manual for the TAD1000-series coaxial VHF antennas   donated by Skipp   Description, Installation, Assembly, Parts. 150KB PDF file
Covers the models TAD1001x, TAD1002x, TAD1003x, TAD1004x, TAD6071x, TAD6072x, TAD6073x, TAD6074x (where "x" is an "A" or a "B").
  VHF unity-gain antenna model information and specifications for the TAD1010-series antennas   donated by Skip   255KB PDF file
More info on the 1001, 1002, 1003 and 1004 models listed above, plus info on the TAD1012x, TAD1013x, TAD1014x, TAD1021x, TAD1022x, TAD1023x and TAD1024x series (where "x" is an "A" or a "B").
  VHF 3dB-gain antenna model information and specifications for the TDD602x-series antennas   donated by Skip   240KB PDF file
Covers the models TAD6021A, TAD6022A, TAD6023A and TAD6024A units.
  VHF 5.5dB-gain antenna model information and specifications for the Motorola branded Stationmaster style antennas   donated by Skip   268KB PDF file
This sheet covers the models TDD6071A, TDD6072A, TDD6073A, TDD6074A, TDD6075A, TDD6081A, TDD6082A, TDD6083A, TDD6084A, TDD6085A, TDD6090A, and TDD6100A.


Towers

How to look up a tower location   Lists all FCC registered towers - broadcast, cellular, everything... (offsite link - to the Berkana server)
Tower lookup page at the FCC web site   (offsite link - to the FCC server)
The Rohn Towers 2004 Catalog   38 Mb PDF file
This was sent in anonymously and it's a big download.

Connectors, Coax and Shielding
The feedline and the connectors can make or break a system. If you stick to Heliax, Superflex, RG-393 and RG-400 for cable, silver plated connectors and absolutely minimal adapters (and those need to be silver plated) then you will minimize your problems.
WA2ISE's chart of the specs of common coax cables   By Robert Casey WA2ISE
Another chart of the specs of common coax cables   (offsite link)   Courtesy of Coastel Cable Tools of Syracuse, New York
More specifications (bend radius, velocity factor, loss) of common coaxial cable types   By A Nony Mous
Yet another chart of cable specifications of common coaxial cable types   By TX-RX Corporation
Double Shielded Coax Cable   The differences between RG-142 and RG-400, and why you DON'T want to use RG-142...   by Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
Shielding Effectiveness....   A 268kb PDF Document by Andrew Corp. covering the types and parameters of shielded cables.   Original copy is here.
Installing PL-259 connectors on FSJ1-50A 1/4" Superflex Heliax   a photo article by Tony King  W4ZT.
MIL-SPEC for RG214 dated 1986   328 KB PDF courtesy of Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
RG-214 is the good double-shielded coax that has the stranded center conductor and the solid polyethelene core. Each strand is individually silver plated. Both shields are made from 34ga silver plated copper wire. The inner shield exceeds 95% coverage and the outer shield equals or exceeds 98% coverage.
MIL-SPEC for RG214 dated 1991   courtesy of Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
This is the new RG-214 that meets the requirement of the vertical flame test. It has the aluminum coated polyester tape layer between the outer braid and the outer jacket.
Amendment 1 to MIL-SPEC C-17/75F for RG214 and RG365 dated 1998   courtesy of Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
This is simply an administrative update.
We'd like to have similar info on RG-142, RG-393 and RG-400.

Calculators (dBm / voltage, intermod, fade margin, etc.)
Converting between dbm and millivolts or microvolts   A no-math graphical calculator   it's only a xerox copy of the metal rim of a attenuator wheel from a Measurements Corp. Model 80 RF Signal Generator... but it's very handy.   Courtesy of Ray Von Neumann K6PUW
I suggest that you print this out and tape it to the front panel of your signal generator that is calibrated in uV and mV only. Once you realize how dbM numbers work you will find yourself referring to it on a regular basis.
Converting between dbm and millivolts or microvolts   A no-math tabular calculator (a lookup table).   The above xerox of the attenuator scale is easier to use.
dBm to Microvolts Conversion Chart   By IFR Corp.   The above xerox of the attenuator scale is easier to use.
An online intermod calculator from AudioTechnica     Note that this is oriented to wireless microphones, but since it handles up to 30 frequencies it is very handy.   (offsite link).
Another downloadable intermod calculator   This one is shareware written by KE6QH.
This downloadable calculator program figures intercept points and device intermod levels     This one is is from Kessler Systems Inc.   (offsite link)
This online calculator program from TCS Consultants, Inc.   saves the site description to a 'cookie' file on your computer.   (offsite link)
Online fade margin calculator program from TCS Consultants, Inc.   This is neat!   (offsite link)
FCC HAAT (Height Above Average Terrain) Calculator   (offsite link to the FCC web site)
FCC Coordinate Calculation Program   (offsite link to the FCC web site)
This is a useful calcualtor for point-to-point links... "This program will calculate the end coordinates, in degrees, minutes and seconds, given an initial set of coordinates, a bearing or azimuth (referenced to True North or 0 degrees), and a distance...."
FCC Coordinate Conversion Program   (offsite link to the FCC web site)
"This utility permits the user to convert latitude and longitude between decimal degrees and degrees, minutes, and seconds. For convenience, a link is included to the National Geodetic Survey's NADCON program, which allows conversions between the NAD83 / WGS84 coordinate system and the older NAD27 coordinate system. NAD27 coordinates are presently used for broadcast authorizations and applications."
FCC Distance Calculation Program   (offsite link to the FCC web site)
"This program will calculate the distance and azimuth (referenced to True North) between two sets of coordinates on the earth."

The last four calculators above are courtesy of Dale Bickel of the USA Federal Communications Commission. The FCC also has a number of "Conversions" calculators including FM Channel to Frequency, FM Frequency to Channel, TV Channel to Frequency Band, Feet to/from Meters, Miles to/from Kilometers, dBu to/from mV/m, kW to/from dBk, Relative Field, Transmission Line Efficiency, and more.

An old DB Products DOS program that calculates down-tilt for antennas   128kb ZIP file
An old DB Products DOS program that plots some antenna patterns   383kb ZIP file
An old DB Products DOS program that gives you some insight into the effects of side-mounting vertical antennas  134kb ZIP file

The above three programs were supplied by Dave Gartner WD6AXM.

Mobile Antennas
Hints:
(1) Don't use solid center conductor coax on a mobile antenna (especailly on something that moves, like a trunk lid). Yes, it seems obvious, but you'd be surprised...
(2) Punch-mounts are 20 times better than clamp-on-the-edge-of-the-trunk-lid mounts and 50 times better than magnetic mounts. If you have to use a mag mount use a 1/2 wave antenna intended for zero-ground-plane installations (like what would be on a motorcycle saddle bag or a Corvette rear deck). Larsen makes some good ones, as does Tram (the model 1155 is VHF, the 1175B is UHF and both work well).

Think about this: You have a 5/8 wave antenna with a flexible whip. The whip is a radiating element. At 60 MPH the top foot of that whip is bent back almost horizontal.   What kind of a pattern does that give you?   I switched to a center-loaded dual band whip with a fairly stiff rod about a year ago.   My signal flutter was reduced by over 50%...

A mobile coaxial sleeve antenna for 2m   450 KB PDF file from the Aug 2001 issue
The sleeve vertial (actually a coaxial dipole) is handy when you have no ground plane to work with.
A Motorized Mag Mount for Mobile Antennas   1.53 MB PDF file from the May 2005 issue
An interesting modification to an off-the-shelf Diamond mount.
Base and mobile antenna cutting chart from Larsen Antennas    a 668kb PDF file from the Larsen web site, specifically the Technical Reference page.
Mobile antenna patterns and designations    a 1.6mb PDF file from the Larsen web site.
Low band radios that cover a wide frequency range (like the GE Delta, GE Rangr, Motorola Syntor X or Syntor X-9000 which covers 28-54 MHz in one range) have a big problem: the antenna bandwidth is much narrower than the radio is - most low band antennas are limited to about 1mhz in bandwidth.   Autotuning antennas have been around for a while, but a good design is fairly recent (the so-called "screwdriver" design).   A long time a go Motorola came up with a no-moving-parts solution: a "Diplex Antenna Matching" kit that allowed two differently cut low band whip antennas on one radio (i.e. one could be on 36 MHz and the other on 43 MHz), and done in a way that prevented them from interfering with each other.   The two antennas can be cut to any two low band frequencies.   Here is the complete documentation on the kit (Motorola manual part number 68-80100W86, a 1.9mb PDF), which contains three pages of info - enough to duplicate it yourself.
But if you need more than two 1-mhz-wide "windows" then you need an autotuner and a good screwdriver antenna.
The KØBG web site   (link to another web site)
Alan Applegate KØBG lives in Roswell, New Mexico and has created a very good reference web site for mobile amateur radio operators. I was pointed to it by a police department radio tech. While the site has a lot of material oriented to HF mobile, there is a lot of information that is relevant to VHF operation as well. Just look at the index along the left edge. If you look at nothing else, the Alternators and Batteries page and the Antenna Mounts page is worth your time.
W8JI's page on Inductors and Loading Coil Current (Mobile and Loaded Antennas)   (link to another web site)
Charles Rouch has a good web page on loading coils and how they work. It's HF oriented but the math is the same.
Urgent Communications Mobile Radio Installation Notes   (link to another web site)
Urgent Communications is a two-way radio industry publication, and their web site has some notes on mobile radio installations.
You've heard of co-phased antennas? Well, here's the co-tanger antenna.

Back to the top of the page
Back to Home

This web page created and first posted 14-Oct-2004.


Layout and hand coded HTML © Copyright 1995 and date of last update by Mike Morris WA6ILQ

This web page, this web site, the information presented in and on its pages and in these modifications and conversions is © Copyrighted 1995 and (date of last update) by Kevin Custer W3KKC and multiple originating authors.   All Rights Reserved, including that of paper and web publication elsewhere.